Like most sites this site uses cookies : By continuing to use our site you are agreeing to our cookie policy.close & accept [x]
Resources Centre / Twins Tips Introduction / Twins Tips / Research : Twin Infants Sleep Studies
Research : Twin Infants Sleep Studies
Sleeping arrangements of twin infants

This study assessed sleeping arrangements used by parents for their twin infants to determine what information might be useful for parents regarding twin infant sleep.


The study was conducted in 3 parts:

  • An assessment of sleeping arrangements for 60 pairs of twin infants from 0-5 months;
  • Video of the behaviours of 10 pairs of twin infants under 3m sleeping together at home;
  • Behavioural and physiological monitoring of 14 pairs of twin infants under 3 months of age sleeping together and apart in a sleep lab environment.

Part 1: A sample of 60 families recruited via TAMBA (Twin and Multiple Birth Association) kept sleep logs and participated in telephone interviews when their twin infants were 1, 3 and in some cases 5m of age. At 1 month of age the majority of twins were co-bedded (60%), with parents taking their cues on sleeping arrangements from those experienced on the post-natal ward.


Co-bedded infants predominantly slept together in a cot (92%) while infants who slept apart were predominantly in separate Moses baskets (86%) in the 1st month. Co-bedded twins were initially positioned side-by-side (68%), however at least 8 co-bedding configurations were recorded. The vast majority of infants slept on their back (86% in 1st month, 92% in 3rd month) with no association found between sleeping arrangement and sleeping position.


Potential disturbance of each others sleep was the primary parental reason for sleeping twins apart, but overheating and unspecified cot-death fears were mentioned by a handful of families. "The babies prefer it" was a common explanation for co-bedding although several parents also mentioned that babies were more synchronised in their feeding and waking patterns which facilitated night-time care-giving. Concerns about overheating or co-twin suffocation caused 4 families to fashion barriers to separate their twins within a cot.


A third of the pairs co-bedded in the 1st month were separated for sleep by the 3rd month (overall proportions = 40% together, 60% apart in 3rd month). A greater proportion of twin infants slept in a separate room from their parents in the 1st month than did singleton infants in a previous study (27% cf 8%).


Part 2: 10 twin pairs (9DZ, 1MZ) were videoed sleeping together at home, 4 in head-to-head and 6 in side-by-side configurations. Sleep duration was unaffected by co-bedding configuration. Babies sleeping side-by-side were observed to occasionally obstruct one another's airways with arms across the others face, but also exhibited a greater degree of observed sleep state synchrony than those sleeping head-to-head.


Part 3: 14 twin pairs (12DZ, 2MZ) participated in a 2-condition trial sleeping together and apart in the sleep lab. We found no consistent difference in temperature patterns between the two conditions. Those infants that spent the greatest proportion of the co-bedded night physically touching one another exhibited overlapping temperature patterns on the co-bedded and the separate night. Neither the nadir of the post-sleep temperature fall, nor the peak temp recorded during REM or Quiet sleep, differed between the two sleep conditions. Airway obstruction of one twin by the others arm during co-bedding was observed for 1 twin pair and was associated with lowered oxygen saturation, followed by arousal and movement by the affected twin. Head covering by bedding was not observed during the co-bedded night.


Conclusions:

In this study co-bedding did not appear to be more risky than separate sleeping for twin infants under 3 months of age. Co-bedded infants did not wake more frequently in the night than those sleeping separately, in fact their arousal patters were more synchronous. Co-bedded infants sleeping in close bodily contact with one another did not exhibit increased core temperature, although parents should be given guidance on appropriate use of bed covers. Although not discussed above, swaddling co-bedded infants may be problematic. Regarding SIDS reduction, the primary reason to encourage co-bedding of twins is to facilitate keeping twins in the parental bedroom by the use of a single cot. Parents of twins may benefit from specific information that it is the presence of an adult caregiver, not the presence of another infant that is associated with reduced SIDS risk.

Project publication - Ball (2006) Together or apart? A behavioural and physiological investigation of sleeping arrangements for twin infants.

Caring for twin infants: sleeping arrangements and their implications

Aim. The study aimed to assess sleeping arrangements used by parents for twin infants and to determine what information might be useful for health professionals and parents regarding twin infant sleep.

Method. A self-selected sample of 60 families recruited via Tamba (Twins and Multiple Births Association), local health professionals and newspapers maintained sleep logs and participated in telephone interviews when their twin infants were one, three and five months of age.

Results. The authors found significant associations between home sleeping arrangements and sleeping arrangements on the postnatal ward, infant age and sleep furniture used in the home. At one month of age, 60% of twins were co-bedded, 92% of which shared a cot while 86% of twins sleeping apart were in separate Moses baskets. Co-bedded twins were initially positioned side-by-side (68%), however eight co-bedding configurations were documented over the first three months. Sleep duration was the primary reason given by parents for sleeping twins either apart or together, but no significant differences were found for parental or infant sleep duration. Co-bedded twins were less likely to be moved from their parents' room than those who slept apart (9% versus 33%), however a few parents of co-bedded twins introduced unnecessary hazards into their twins' sleeping environments with the inappropriate use of bedding and make-shift barriers between the babies.

Conclusions.

Department of Health advice to parents on reducing the risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) recommends sleeping infants in their parent(s) room for the first six months of life. Co-bedding appears to facilitate compliance with this recommendation via the use of a single cot. The strong association between hospital and home sleeping arrangements suggests that co-bedding twins on the postnatal ward may encourage parents to do so at home. By discussing sleeping arrangements for twin babies with parents, both hospital and community midwives could help to educate parents about the most appropriate ways of co-bedding twin infants and avoidance of unsafe practices.

Project publication - Ball (2006) Caring for twin infants: night-time strategies and their implications Evidence Based Midwifery, Volume 4, Number 1, July 2006, pp. 10-16 Author: Ball, Helen L.

Our Resource Centre has lots more information and advice on a range of multiple-related subjects including Twins Sleeping and The First Year,




< Back

Back to Resources Centre


Search Twins Tips

Back to Resources Centre
.Twins & Multiples Birth Book Essential Guide
Twins ! Pregnancy. Birth and the First Year of Life
Raising Twins from Birth to Adolescence
Cot Divider - Safababy Sleeper

Copyright 2008 Twins International Ltd.